I juste discovered wreckamovie, and find it really awesome.
Though, I'm in free arts and free softwares for many years, now, and I was first astonished and a bit disappointed by the fact that most project were in "All rights reserved" license, even if they will be diffused as CC-by-sa (for example) later on.
I finally understood the reason when I sax there were only three licenses available, two of them being free, but not copylefted (so no obligation for derivative works to keep free), and on which is not free.
I would suggest to add two other copylefted licences, like:
- CC-by-sa-nc for those who doesn't want any commercial use of their art,
- Free Art License for those who looks for strict copyleft
By the way, it's also a bit annoying not to know what version of the CC license we're signing for (in France, CC-3.0 is really problematic).
Jump to comment form
Comments
Oh, I thought I was in the "re-branding the platform". Sure I'll do it.
we have talked about optimising WaM for actual production needs, but at the current state, the participation is way too low to justify this... and I think that subproductions and linking would make everything even more complicated.
However, there is already the option to create "groups" in a production, which can be used to only work on certain things with certain people. But as I said, mostly this isn't even necessary because there's not enough active participants.
Of course overally you're right, that something has to be done to make operating the site easier and clearer. See the "re-branding the platform" task for this and submit your ideas =)
You must login or register to comment