The Iron Sky -team is looking for your ideas and comments.

Join and show your support for Iron Sky.

EARTH FLEET: Other countries?

This task is closed
Created atNovember 13, 2008
Created byTimo Vuorensola
ClosedNovember 25, 2009
Shots given66
Reference media
Earth_fleet_moodboard01_thumb Earth_fleet_moodboard02_thumb

Closing Note

Thanks *everyone* for great shots and comments! We've had so far very good ideas, and will start designing the Earth Fleet ships based on your ideas.

We're going to need further assistance later on, and we'll put more specific tasks as we move along.

Great stuff!

Description

EARTH FLEET: USA

In Iron Sky, the Earth will stand up and defend itself against the Nazi enemy. In 2018, many of the countries have developed their space program - maybe in the shadows, maybe in open - to also be able to engage in a fight in the orbit or in deep space, if necessary.

In this task, we need ideas for what the space ship of OTHER countries would look like? Who would have the tech - secret or public - to build one? Your country? Your neighbouring country? Something else? Be creative!

We'd request everything from descriptions to concept drawings, from crude ideas to finalized artwork - whatever is your game.

Few guidelines:

- The film is set in 2018 - so don't get over-excited on tech!
- There's no such thing as "interstellar travel" or "antigravity" invented.
- Be reasonable - try to be functional, and limit your ideas to feasible technologial advancements.
- For ideas, you can look for example the "Venture Star" -program:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venture_Star

We've already discussed the weapons technology in the previous task:

http://www.wreckamovie.com/tasks/show/52

Maybe reading through the thumbed-up -shots (you can sort them in the task) would give some
ideas as well.

Included you'll find some concept art of stuff our concept artist Jussi has done. You may use them non-commercially and share them with others, but not claim them your own or charge money from them. Here's more info on the CC-license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/

As the licence in Iron Sky production requires, you need to give all the rights for derivative or original work you do for this task to the Iron Sky team for us being able to use them.

Go for it, people! Let's design the greatest space fleet in the history of film!


This task is closed.

Shots

Order by
Dsci0026_thumb
Eamon McCarthy November 10, 2009 01:54 1 Thumb-up
Add to Favorites |

Does Japan Come To Play?

Well as we all know japan was allies with the the Nazis well are the going to be allies in 2018? Or maybe thats how japan is so technologically advanced in robotics. I don't know just something to think about.

Jump to comment form

Comments

Kris S. November 10, 2009 06:54 Flag

The Japan that allied with the Nazis was a military dictatorship with a huge army.

I doubt modern democratic Japan would want to side with the Nazis, and even if they did they don't have a proper army to make any difference militarily. Most of Japan's defence forces are American soldiers left over from the post-war occupation.

Le_voyage_dans_la_lune_thumb
Jack Malinowski October 10, 2009 15:53 2 Thumb-ups
Add to Favorites |

Space Traffic?

I wonder as to the kind of space traffic present in 2018?

Is it more / less?

Is it more / less secretive? military? or commercial?

Have trips to zero gravity and 'space garbage awareness' replaced or joined such fashionable occasions as 'safari'?

I would assume the gargantuan 'Waste Management' industry to have taken a large chunk out of the Space Budget Worldwide...

The List
- Next generation conventional fighters, etc.
- Next generation stealths -
- Next generation low orbit stealth intercepts (Einhorningen)
- Next generation low-orbit / Tropospheric fighters (One World Squadrons) : They might not be able to enter / exit the atmosphere...
- Experimental multi-atmospheric fighters (Rolson's Lazer Engine / Fusion Reactor)
- Satellites
- Space Garbage

Jump to comment form

Comments

Jack Malinowski October 24, 2009 20:01 Flag

Great point, TS :
Perhaps the Suborbtial Freighting community is taking to increased 'manual insurance' (akin to u-boats) protecting the recent major investments in human, chattel, and securities freighting...
via privatized Air Couriers...

States then seek to police the 'incorporated' space...

Perhaps the Lunar Nazi Group sees this as a threat to air dominance.

Thomas Shaddack October 24, 2009 07:56 Flag

Also suborbital freight. There are developments in very fast transportation between continents. Will be high-coist so mostly used for couriering and military transportation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub-orbital_spaceflight
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/03/19/324085/aerospace-primes-show-suborbital-military-transport.html

Kris S. October 10, 2009 16:08 Flag

There might actually be a fair amount of space tourism, as there are a number of companies now building craft specifically for recreational flights.

Also there's even been talk of space tourist trips to the moon, not actually landing but just going round it. Apparently if you can get into Earth orbit it's not that difficult to go across to the Moon's orbit and back. So that's another form of space tourism that might actually exist in the near future.

Griffon_thumb
Yann Sauvage October 13, 2009 03:00 5 Thumb-ups

Jump to comment form

Comments

Jack Malinowski October 14, 2009 14:11 Flag

Perhaps the Einhorningen might have been conceived as a 'Star Wars' project - a Stealth / Ballistic missile intercept - more reliable than a patriot missile platform.

They can enter the Stratosphere and use boosters to hover, acting as a manual net of International Peacekeeping, coming out of the sun to stop Espionage / Violence : 'Fighters Without Borders' so to speak.

It might be a labor intensive alternative a virtual net, but perhaps that would be the UN's goal... perhaps this Saab fighters mark the UN's predominance as a real-time peacekeeping deterring force?

David Jansson October 13, 2009 17:24 Flag

If this makes it into the final film? Will there be toys?

David Jansson October 13, 2009 17:18 Flag

Oh, and I renamed it Enhörningen (The unicorn) out of respect for Astrid Lindgren. She would be turning in her grave if she heard that a name from her books was use by a military craft, even if it is fictional...

So please don't use the name Vildvittran if the design makes it into the final film?

David Jansson October 13, 2009 17:14 Flag

Wow!

Though it lost it's retro thrusters, I keep feeling it will crush into something. But that's just me, being all logical. Can't help it.

It looks killer.

Yet, with a little creativity maybe you could get retro boosters without loosing the pointyness of the manoeuvring booster racks?

My thoughts of the RJAS in action: http://www.wreckamovie.com/system/shot_medias/0000/1287/IronSkyR-JAS-Storyboard.png

Jack: The original design only had the missiles on top of the wings, my thought was that they would be shielded there. But that doesn't stop you from putting stuff beneath that you jettison before re-entry (If you have any left). Just remember to put the most expensive missiles at the top rack.

Yann Sauvage October 13, 2009 17:10 Flag

The base concept inpires me more an atmospheric fighter...
Trying to reentering the atmosphere will certainly finish in a great ball of fire! :)

Jack Malinowski October 13, 2009 14:36 Flag

External Explosives?

Wouldn't they explode reentering the atmosphere?

Jani Salomaa October 13, 2009 14:31 Flag

Looks fast as a bullett! A nice design for a light interceptor.

The sleek shape makes me wonder where all the fuel would go... Maybe it comes with reserve fuel tanks that are jettisoned just before the fight.

Yann Sauvage October 13, 2009 13:04 Flag

Thanks!
I think it can fly in atmosphere too. ;)

Timo-Heikki Mäkelä October 13, 2009 04:42 Flag

I started wondering, whether there could/should be yet another thruster on top of the rudder, too? The rudder just looks so useless for spaceflight else. Also, the rudder might carry some weaponry as well. (Remember, in space aerodynamics doesn't really count. But don't ruin the great looks...)

Timo-Heikki Mäkelä October 13, 2009 03:51 Flag

Beauuuuuutiful! :)

Avatar_thumb
David Jansson October 14, 2009 14:24 1 Thumb-up
Add to Favorites |

Yann Sauvage Photoshopped

I photoshoped in some retro thrusters. What do you think?

Saab_vildvittran_thumb

Jump to comment form

Comments

Kris S. October 14, 2009 15:51 Flag

I can't comment on the fighter, they both look fine to me.

David Jansson October 14, 2009 14:49 Flag

Yes yes, what about the fighter?

I think I should have placed the retro thrusters on the side rather than on top though. Would have made more sense for the zero G feel...

Kris S. October 14, 2009 14:35 Flag

LOL at the title, I thought we were going to see something horrible done to Yann... :D

Griffon_thumb
Yann Sauvage October 04, 2009 21:10 12 Thumb-ups
Add to Favorites |

Spitfire Supersonic Fighter

A concept developed with Kris S.
RAF strikes back with a supersonic Spitfire!

Spitfire_thumb
Spit_multi_thumb

Jump to comment form

Comments

Peter Vesterbacka October 13, 2009 15:32 Flag

Would be great to see some renders with both Spitfires and and nazi UFOs.

Jani Salomaa October 13, 2009 14:27 Flag

I seriously can't think of a better vehicle to fight Space Nazi UFO's than Space Spitfires!

Spitfires always bring back memories of my childhood Commando Comics (Korkeajännitys)...

Yann, grand job realizing them!

Timo-Heikki Mäkelä October 09, 2009 06:01 Flag

Damn, that looks pretty! It popped into my mind to suggest such a modern 'Spitfire' as well a couple of months ago, but I thought no one would pick it up and actually do something about it. Great thing Yann actually made it!

Now, as you got into motion... Would it be possible to get similar modernized versions of IL-2 and Mustang, too? 'IL-2' looking heavily armored 'flying tank', which is hard to imagine getting off ground, but which can almost be shot against with nuclear arms without breaking once it does. And 'Mustang' sure would have the 'shark teeth' under its nose...

Yann Sauvage October 07, 2009 17:09 Flag

Sorry Kris.
As i said, if someone could map it, i share the mesh (All files formats).
I've posted differents views of the basic mesh.

Kris S. October 07, 2009 14:57 Flag

Okay Yann don't worry, if it's tricky it doesn't matter.

Yann Sauvage October 07, 2009 14:45 Flag

David,

"Are the ring of hole like textures at the nose cone and at the back of the cockpit manoeuvring thrusters?"
They aren't, it's an atmospheric fighter not equiped for space flight (At the origin).

"If you wish, take a look at my space fighter concept. I think it has potential, but I didn't make such a refined painting as you did. Just a cople of very rough sketches. Please have a look."
Cool! If i find time i'll modelize the Saab Vildvittran.

Kris,

"Yann I think it would be easiest to judge how this looks if the RAF colours were added to it."
The software i use isn't good for UVW mapping.
All the marks i added to the other pics were added in 2D postrend.
So, if i try it on the Spitfire (Wich needs an entire mapping) it will be... Eurk!
I can share the meshe with anybody who can map it correctly. ;)

Stig-Magnus Gjerald October 07, 2009 11:39 Flag

Aggree on adding a touch of realism to make dogfights look cooler, to me i loved the fights in space:above & beyond, and this fighter has similarities to the hammerhead fighter earth uses in that series.
To me hammerheads, starfuries(various other b5 ships)and now the reimagined spitfire are what I (my opinion) personally feel is what a dogfighter would look like in 2018

never been a big fan of the viper, x-wing etc, to me none of them look like dogfighters.

David Jansson October 07, 2009 11:25 Flag

This youtube video explains what I am talking about, with some beautifull examples from Babylon 5, Battlestar Galactica and Space Above and beyond.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GihlZ0Mnq-k&feature=related

Space dogfights actually get a lot, and I mean A LOT, cooler with a little reality thrown in. (Not too much though.)

Kris S. October 07, 2009 10:51 Flag

Yann I think it would be easiest to judge how this looks if the RAF colours were added to it.

A classic spitfire colour scheme might be:

http://www.warbirdalley.com/images/spitfire-IIA.jpg

David Jansson October 07, 2009 10:15 Flag

Are the ring of hole like textures at the nose cone and at the back of the cockpit manoeuvring thrusters? Watch a space battle from the new Battlestar Galactica And you will understand how they can up the coolness factor of a space battle.

If you wish, take a look at my space fighter concept. I think it has potential, but I didn't make such a refined painting as you did. Just a cople of very rough sketches. Please have a look. http://www.wreckamovie.com/system/shot_medias/0000/1275/StarWreckJAS2.png
http://www.wreckamovie.com/shots/show/2624

Yann Sauvage October 07, 2009 05:07 Flag

Thanks for your comments!

Objectively, it couldn't be a XXI century design.
But it could be a prototype developed at the near end of the war (Jet engines were functionals).
Think about it:
A hero or a group of heroes discover an old secret hangar with this kind of machines...
So, i'm not scenarist! ;)

Stig-Magnus Gjerald October 07, 2009 00:52 Flag

Im Norwegian, and even I got the " ah, spitfire!!" reaction, when i read the description and saw the images. Not only is it a beautiful design, but the spit in itself is a symbol. How many have not dreamed of being in a dogfight flying one at some point as a kid(I sure did:-)

For the 2018 designers motivation, well maybe they dicovered this was the optimal design and saw similarities between old/new immediately, and also realized the pr potential"Spitfire-The legend continues"

To me, it doesn´t need any motivation..Just use it, guns blazing:-D

Angela October 06, 2009 18:33 Flag

Wow. Absolutely WOW. I have no words. :)

Kris S. October 06, 2009 14:44 Flag

I would guess that they would be part of some multi-national NATO-style group and assigned a specific task within that group.

But maybe we shouldn't take this too seriously, and just leave the animators to put the craft in wherever they look cool! :-)

Jack Malinowski October 06, 2009 14:37 Flag

regarding your point,
understood KrisS. :

- i'm wondering after the motivation of the commissioned '2018' designers... where are these planes to be found? in normal 'common wealth' low orbit rotation? or are these 'presentational fighter planes' commissioned at the dawn of 'space' patrolling that the British deemed a suitable symbol of air superiority?

- what are these planes dog-fighting potential? how slow can they go?
- i would think that propeller planes might actually prove the most difficult target for ufo's capable of sustaining flight through inertia / helicopters...

Kris S. October 06, 2009 14:20 Flag

"are you suggesting that designers in 2018 were commissioned to recreate this plans for militant reasons?"

This isn't a 1940s spitfire, it's 2018 spitfire. It looks a bit like the old spitfire but it's actually a totally up to date fighter.

The point would be to remind the viewer of a previous conflict where Nazis were fought off in massive aerial battles. The design would be for emotional purposes, because some of the audience will feel an emotional attachment to the classic spitfire.

Jack Malinowski October 06, 2009 14:10 Flag

'breathtaking'

i would imagine that this 'spitfire' group would be part of some memorial / war museum exhibit ('the space smithsonian' for example)

are you suggesting that designers in 2018 were commissioned to recreate this plans for militant reasons?

Stig-Magnus Gjerald October 06, 2009 11:03 Flag

Thats pure greatness right there:-D To me the fighters from 30-40s are the most beautiful planes ever built, and you have captured the look perfectly!

Duncan Jinks October 05, 2009 16:08 Flag

That is.....

AWESOME
How you modeled that so well i dunno. And what Kris S said... toright. It'd get most of the people I know in the cinemas.

Peter Vesterbacka October 05, 2009 04:49 Flag

Very cool, a modernized Spitfire is exactly what is needed.

Yann Sauvage October 04, 2009 22:51 Flag

Thanks a lot Kris!
My english is too poor for a good reply.
But, i'm not a genius...
You're the concept founder!
The plane must be modernized to have a 21st century look.
:)

Kris S. October 04, 2009 21:30 Flag

That's absolutely terrific, it's got the right 1940s style to match the Nazi UFOs, and it definitely looks like a Spitfire!

Brilliant, well done Yann, you're a genius. I suggested this today and the concept is there in just a few hours... wow.

All it needs now is some camouflage paint and/or RAF decals.

From a marketing point of view, that would definitely resonate with a British audience, or with anyone who knows about the Battle of Britain. Publicity for the film in the UK could concentrate on this particular craft, and other countries' craft could be used for publicity in their respective countries.

(Come to think of it, a lot of other countries fought in the Battle of Britain because the UK was the last major Ally that wasn't occupied. The best-performing pilots were Polish, and some of them flew Spitfires so they too might appreciate seeing this new Spitfire in the film.)

Griffon_thumb
Yann Sauvage September 23, 2009 20:25 5 Thumb-ups
Add to Favorites |

Navy Ship

Hello!
I'm french and my english isn't very good.
So, i've made a pic thinking about your future great movie!
If it can give you some ideas...
An US Carrier like a "Cigar UFO".
Maybe i'll work on an US Shuttle or Fighter soon.

Iron_sky_navy_thumb

Jump to comment form

Comments

Kris S. October 13, 2009 14:40 Flag

Jani, I never thought of the whale probe as liquorice before, but now every time I see it I'll be thinking of Fazer laku. And I thought it was such a cool design before...

Jani Salomaa October 13, 2009 14:37 Flag

Heh, the tube shape reminds me of the infamous liquorice space ship in Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home.. http://files.kinabrew.com/images/StarTrekWhaleProbe.jpg

Yann Sauvage October 04, 2009 13:10 Flag

Thanks a lot Kris! :)

Kris S. October 04, 2009 08:54 Flag

This is my favourite of all Yann's excellent designs. They're all good though, so hopefully as many as possible will make it into the film.

Oskar Lönnberg September 26, 2009 17:08 Flag

Those are cool spaceships. I like them

Yann Sauvage September 24, 2009 16:11 Flag

Thank you very much!

Peter Vesterbacka September 24, 2009 14:30 Flag

Very nice design.

No-user-picture-set
Charles Moak October 12, 2009 03:25 1 Thumb-up
Add to Favorites |

Shot from history

The Chinese air force and space program was, until very recently in the 20th century, based entirely upon wood. Perhaps as the situation grows desperate they will bring out a fleet of "classic" wooden fighters? That would be so hilariously fun to watch. Wooden chinese fighter jets against Nazi aerial tanks.

Jump to comment form

Comments

This shot doesn't have comments.

Me-in-my-fathers-old-uniform_thumb
Gert-Jan Van de Voorde October 11, 2009 12:46 1 Thumb-up
Add to Favorites |

Not really a suggestion...

But more like a promo for Iron Sky, I used the space ships of Yann.
Except for the nazi spaceship: it's the one from the task 'Anti-air against the nazis'

Iron_skypromo_thumb

Jump to comment form

Comments

Gert-Jan Van de Voorde October 11, 2009 14:21 Flag

yeah perhaps

Kris S. October 11, 2009 13:13 Flag

I think Peter talked about having an Iron Sky poster task soon, so maybe you could enter this there too?

Filosofi_thumb
Timo-Heikki Mäkelä October 09, 2009 06:43 2 Thumb-ups
Add to Favorites |

An insane *ODDBALL* spaceship?

Taking it from absurd to insane...

Could someone imagine among all the more or less crazy but still 'reasonable' looking spacecrafts already designed here: a spaceship - or even a whole fleet of such - which would would look so COMPLETELY INSANE BEYOND ALL IMAGINATION (an extention of FUBAR...), that there's no way it ever could be reasonable for any use, and that there's no way of avoiding laughing stoplessly immediately when seeing it? "Ueber-engineering" to the extreme might be the word.

Let's call that a competition for all graphic designers here...

Jump to comment form

Comments

Timo-Heikki Mäkelä October 11, 2009 11:10 Flag

Yup. It might be built imaginatively, but it could never work or if it actually could, it would most certainly work somehow perversely.

Say, using the otherwise ingenious main gun would by necessity hit the back of the pilot's head. Or the vehicle would have way too much armament and no room left for effective controls, so that it really couldn't be controlled by any means. Or its hypertech selfdefences would apparently make it defenceless...

Ueber-engineering. Losing the point.

Kris S. October 11, 2009 10:33 Flag

Timo, so the idea is:

Just because you CAN build it, that doesn't mean you SHOULD build it.

?

Timo-Heikki Mäkelä October 11, 2009 07:41 Flag

Kris... That's the sort of thing I mean. It might be feasible to engineer such a vehicle, and it sure does represent 'some' sort of ingenuity. But by getting too far in powerfulness it would immediately appear absurd and insane.

That counts as the first OK idea for this. Let's get more. And graphics sketches would naturally be preferred.

Unfortunately I'm no graphics designer myself, so I cannot toss in my views in graphics. I might sketch "something with way too many moving parts to make any sense" myself. But that's just one possibility, and a very laborous one.

Daniel Saarimäki October 10, 2009 17:20 Flag

Big rubbery and stupid looking fish going trough the space!

Kris S. October 10, 2009 15:41 Flag

Okay, I'm still not 100% sure what the task is, but how about this:

A ship where the engines are stupidly huge, like the engines from the destroyers in Star Wars, but there's just a normal shuttle-style cockpit attached to the front of it with five people in it. So it's very very overpowered for such a small crew.

Jack Malinowski October 10, 2009 15:36 Flag

like a rock-fish / lion fish / scorpion fish : a magnetized space junk compactor that attracts the hordes of space junk in orbit.

but it also has a 'bull-frog' function : capable of devouring satellites and cannibalizing their precious metals...

it's orbit might be determined as well as it's fall trajectory...
the pilot (a kind of Bobafet) might be a 'Sanitory Spaceman' who micro manages the falling toad's trajectory, hoarding precious metals and creating minor havoc for hire as he collects precious metals to expand his profit margin.

He might then eject in a separate ship from the T.O.A.D. (Trans Orbital Avian Detonator) that might appear to be a 'UFO' - though it only functions as a glider.

I would guess him to be a MooNazi sleeper cell. Though I might be wrong.

Timo-Heikki Mäkelä October 10, 2009 15:16 Flag

No, not aliens. Such has been cut away from the film.

"Ueber-engineering".

Timo-Heikki Mäkelä October 09, 2009 20:03 Flag

I didn't mean something ridiculous but rather something so "ingenious" that it actually goes beyond insanity. The idea would be to laugh at something "too serious", if possible. Whatever that might be...

Seppo Hiltunen October 09, 2009 16:37 Flag

Flying wok-pan, teapot or solar wind driven gigantic condom?

I suggested that the space ship "Alexey Leonov" from the movie 2010 could appear in the movie Ironsky, returning from it's Jupiter mission:
:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzNu9wUO-YM

Kris S. October 09, 2009 13:47 Flag

The early 80s cheap sci-fi "Battle Beyond The Stars" had a rather laughable spacecraft:

http://www.badmovies.org/movies/battlebeyond/battlebeyond1.jpg

http://www.badmovies.org/movies/battlebeyond/

David Jansson October 09, 2009 11:36 Flag

You just need to watch Star Wars...

Griffon_thumb
Yann Sauvage September 26, 2009 18:24 8 Thumb-ups
Add to Favorites |

RU Ship

Other ship concept.
A Russian launcher wich can brings 3 combat shuttles to deep space.

Ru_ships_thumb
Pre_launch_thumb

Jump to comment form

Comments

Yann Sauvage October 04, 2009 00:13 Flag

Thank you Peter!

Peter Vesterbacka October 03, 2009 02:41 Flag

Yann, great job with the animation, looks amazing for you just "trying" some animation. Very cool!

Yann Sauvage October 02, 2009 23:57 Flag

So, I've tried to make an animation, it's in the main post.
Making animations is fun, but it takes a lot of time...
I prefer base modeling and concept searching.
:)

Yann Sauvage September 30, 2009 13:06 Flag

Thanks a lot!
I'll try it now.

Peter Vesterbacka September 30, 2009 11:31 Flag

As Kris says, try Blender. We are also working on the Open Rendering Environment (ORE) and that is supporting Blender as well. http://renderfarm.fi has a bit more info on that one.

Kris S. September 30, 2009 04:22 Flag

Yann, I'm not an expert on 3D so I don't know if this is good enough, but a lot of people on here seem to recommend Blender. It's free so there's no harm in at least trying it:

http://www.blender.org/

Yann Sauvage September 30, 2009 04:06 Flag

I'd like too!
But i'm using a free modeler "Wings 3D" and it does not support animations.
If you know a good free renderer which can uses particles and atmospherics systems, please, gimme the link!
Software licenses are too expensive for me. :(

Peter Vesterbacka September 29, 2009 20:26 Flag

Would be really cool to get those things animated.

Yann Sauvage September 29, 2009 04:38 Flag

It is near of the actual US space shuttle concept.
During the launching sequence the shuttle is just linked to the main rocket / boosters without any shield or protections.
It's just an aerodynamic and mechanical constraints challenge.
So, as you said, we could imagine a large rocket nose wich protect the carrier too. ;)

Jack Malinowski September 28, 2009 21:51 Flag

Yann - I wonder if the rocket - which obviously will break up into a multi-functional pod as well might not destroy the 'space ships' at the nose upon traveling as thousands of miles an hour?

Perhaps the space ships might be housed so as not to put undue strain on their moorings?

Kris S. September 27, 2009 22:29 Flag

I don't think it matters whether this is 100% realistic, the important thing is that it's plausible enough to appear in the film.

Yann Sauvage September 27, 2009 16:47 Flag

Thank you!
I've added a pic of the ship in pre-launching status.
It's more clear than long explanations and my english is too bad for that!

Jack Malinowski September 27, 2009 15:28 Flag

totally realistic concept of a functional, though overly specialized, bridging device... (regrarding oskar's insightful comment)

this is exactly the kind of projects that money burning pseudo - military committees churn out - until their all destroyed in the opening stages of the war...

great shot.

Yann Sauvage September 27, 2009 10:21 Flag

Thanks for your comments. :)
It's a launcher which could do only one task: Carrying shuttles from ground to space, like a rocket with satellites.
It can't really do maneuvers.
We can imagine it on the top of a big rocket when launching.
Aeroflot power! ;)

Oskar Lönnberg September 27, 2009 07:01 Flag

Great concept. Like how the fighters are attached to the mother ship. The only thing I was wondering was how the mother ship make sharp turns when all the rocket engines are at the end.

Peter Vesterbacka September 26, 2009 20:10 Flag

Very cool! Like the Aeroflot in there;-)

Kris S. September 26, 2009 19:17 Flag

LOL, didn't notice that.

Dario Odobasich September 26, 2009 19:12 Flag

Ha ha...Aeroflot :-)